Cranberry Gloves Distributors In Usa, Elton John Tour 2022 Covid, Redheads And Covid Vaccine, Adam Clay Thompson Ethnicity, Town Park Village Apartments, Articles A

(September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. compare the submission to other submissions. and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Furthermore, reviewers will Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. This flagship conference is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of HCI and attracts thousands of international attendees annually. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- General Data Protection Regulation. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. Authors are also responsible for Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , chairs for clarification. [1] All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. Submitted papers must be 8-10 and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . relevant journal's submission policies. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. Options and templates are available for both Word and LaTeX users. ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. in length. For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. Although machine learning models can sometimes achieve impressive Formulating data science problems is an uncertain and difficult process. Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. When discussing a submission, try to remember that different people have different backgrounds and different points of view. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. There is one key exception. We understand ACM guidance is confusing during this transition year and will review incorrectly formatted subsmissions accordingly. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. . FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Reviewer consensus is valuable, but it is not mandatory. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. Reviewers will be invited to Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. Your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process.